Theology, Philosophy, God and the Between
Main Article Content
Abstract
How are we to regard William Desmond's work—especially now after the completion of his systematic trilogy with God and the Between? How are we to “locate†Desmond—himself a master “locator� Is he a philosopher or a theologian? Should we be uneasy about an answer that says he is in some sense both?
Thinking of the bond (desmos in Greek) between theology and philosophy, between Jerusalem and Athens, I suggest seeing Desmond as not merely a philosopher who has religious insights, who has philosophical ways of thinking about God, but as a part of the great tradition of Christian philosophical theologians drawing on the philosophical font of Neo-Platonism—the (overtly religious) pinnacle of classical philosophy—a theological tradition extending from Pseudo-Dionysius and Augustine to Bonaventure and beyond.
Desmond, as with these earlier figures, thinks that philosophy and theology can relate to each other intimately, constructively - complementing and completing each other - that indeed theology and philosophy are better off for their interrelation. Could we not see Desmond as taking up this tradition (in spirit if not in the letter) that went into recess with the rise of the modernity? To this end, I will examine the tradition/trajectory of Christian Neo-Platonic philosophical theology—with its robust, if indeed perilous, community between Neo-Platonic philosophy and Christian theology—while taking account of the heterodox tendencies within this tradition. I will then going on to examine the possibility of locating Desmond’s work, specifically what we have in God and the Between, against this background.
Thinking of the bond (desmos in Greek) between theology and philosophy, between Jerusalem and Athens, I suggest seeing Desmond as not merely a philosopher who has religious insights, who has philosophical ways of thinking about God, but as a part of the great tradition of Christian philosophical theologians drawing on the philosophical font of Neo-Platonism—the (overtly religious) pinnacle of classical philosophy—a theological tradition extending from Pseudo-Dionysius and Augustine to Bonaventure and beyond.
Desmond, as with these earlier figures, thinks that philosophy and theology can relate to each other intimately, constructively - complementing and completing each other - that indeed theology and philosophy are better off for their interrelation. Could we not see Desmond as taking up this tradition (in spirit if not in the letter) that went into recess with the rise of the modernity? To this end, I will examine the tradition/trajectory of Christian Neo-Platonic philosophical theology—with its robust, if indeed perilous, community between Neo-Platonic philosophy and Christian theology—while taking account of the heterodox tendencies within this tradition. I will then going on to examine the possibility of locating Desmond’s work, specifically what we have in God and the Between, against this background.
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).