Main Article Content
For more than two decades, John Milbank has criticized the work of Bernard Lonergan for being an example of neo-Kantian transcendental Thomism. For a little less than two decades, a senior Lonergan scholar, Neil Ormerod, has criticized Milbank for being a conceptualist and an anti-realist. Both of these criticisms miss the mark. Moreover, they are emblematic of a missed opportunity for dialogue between two theological projects that have a shared commitment to finding the supernatural within the movement of history and culture. By taking a close look at a passage from Milbank’s Theology and Social Theory on the natural—supernatural distinction in light of Ormerod’s recent publication on the same topic, this essay aims to indicate how seemingly opposed manners of speaking (which can be so terminologically allergenic to one another) can, with some exegetical effort, be shown to express quite concordant positions. Moreover, it aims to suggest some of the topics on which these positions can be developed to the mutual betterment of both projects.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).