Main Article Content
Both Rahner and Nichols have criticised Lonergan’s theological method on the grounds that it fails to adequately take into account the uniqueness of Jesus Christ. Lonergan’s response would be that it is his concept of religious conversion which makes his method genuinely theological. This article begins with an analysis of Lonergan’s concept of religious conversion. It then examines the understanding of repentance, conversion, and the heart presented in the New Testament, with particular attention being paid to Romans 5:5. It will be shown that this understanding and Lonergan’s are radically different. Lonergan’s takes a “proof-texting” approach to the New Testament on conversion. He also takes the same kind of approach to Pascal, Rudolf Otto, and St. Ignatius of Loyola. It will then be argued that Lonergan goes wrong in four specific ways – in focusing on the question of God rather than the problem of evil, in defining faith generically rather than specifically, in an erroneous attempt to avoid a conflation of revelation and salvation, and in falling into a “soft” Pelagianism which does not take the reality of sin seriously enough. The article concludes that the fundamental flaw in Lonergan’s method is that it is “theistic” rather than “Christic.”
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).